Finding the Fakes

June 8, 2010

Recently I did some research into the high number of fake Salvador Dalí prints in the world. In particular, I was trying to verify a print that was ostensibly part of his Don Quixote series. Over the years, a lot of supposed Dalí’s have been confirmed as forgeries and it was my job to investigate the issue. Saddled with several catalog raisonnés (complete and verified lists of all works in a particular artist’s oeuvre), I set to learning as much as possible about fakes versus legitimate Dalís.

During the 80s, the height of the forgeries, Dalí himself addressed the issue. In a formal letter published through his lawyer, Dalí denied a rumor that he had signed a vast quantity of blank paper, to be printed on at a later date. He said works made between the 70s and 80s, credited to himself, were to be looked at carefully before they were accepted as true Dalís. Despite his claims, historians have determined that Dalí did, in fact, sign blank sheets of paper, mostly to more easily facilitate his own art. Fortunately, these sheets have almost all been accounted for and are not part of the forgeries themselves. However, their existence made forgery much easier than it might otherwise have been.

Since the 80s, art historians and art appraisers have worked hard to distinguish the real from the fake and offer a number of tools to assist in the process. Most helpfully, the catalog raisonné includes a complete list of the many variations of Dalí’s signature, providing an initial point of comparison for any print in question. Although it is impossible to account for every possible variation of Dalí’s writing, this list offers a reasonable way of eliminating some works.

Salvador Dalí signatures, 1936-1978

The catalog also addresses the primary groups of images which spawned forgeries. For example, 1981 was a particularly big year for Dalí forgeries. Some 300 copies on a variety of paper sizes were produced, marked by wide margins and forged signatures. The Don Quixote series is one of many which were copied at this time. A problem with identifying forgeries from this period is that Dalí was such a prolific artist and did produce many originals in 1981 using the same subject matter. It is this precise occurrence which has allowed the forgeries to go unnoticed for so long. It is very easy to assume that a new Don Quixote image is real because it is so difficult to account for all the true variations of Don Quixote.

Other ways to distinguish the forgeries include examination of the process used (etching, lithograph, etc.), the format of the image (the style of figures and how they are displayed), the colors of ink used, and the paper itself. None of these are particularly easy to achieve, requiring verified originals for comparison, but are enough to reveal the most obvious forgeries.

Numerous websites (daliarchives.com; chicagoappraisers.com) offer further help distinguishing the real from the fake. Dalí Archives mentions the Don Quixote series, along with Cervantes, El Cid, El Greco, and Velasquez, as popular sources for forgeries. They explain the various locations on prints that Dalí would sign (often inside the plate, rather than in the margin), offering a further way of weeding out the fakes. The Chicago Appraisers even offer a service to help those with questions about their prints determine their validity.

Salvador Dalí. Don Quixote.

It is a sad thing that so many forgeries exist by Dalí, or by any artist for that matter. Marc Chagall is another artist whose work is frequently forged. The prevalence of so many forgeries lowers the value of the originals and casts their validity into question. At the same time, the mystery makes Dalí even more legendary, and in this art historian’s opinion, much more fascinating.

http://daliarchives.com/CollectorsGuild.htm
Related Posts with Thumbnails
Jamie McCann June 28, 2012 at 11:37 PM

Is there any way of telling if my Dali art is legit or forgery without incurring significant expense of hiring an appraiser?

I have some Devine Comedy pieces that I inherited that have his full name signature . Am I right to be skeptical?

Erin June 29, 2012 at 7:37 AM

I would err on the side of skeptical. There is, of course, every chance that they are legitimate, but the number of fake Dali’s out there is pretty enormous. I would suggest getting as much background on where they originally came from to start. Where did your relative get them from? How long ago? From whom? I have not looked into it recently, but there are most likely books out there too designed to help with authenticity of Dali’s prints. If you were willing to do a bit more digging, you might see what, if any, museums have versions of the same prints and what they can tell you about the series. They may know if there are a lot of fakes out there, how many originals were made, etc. Most museums have a research department you can contact for such inquiries.

Hope this helps and I hope they turn out to be real!

Erin

clint October 19, 2012 at 10:36 PM

hello have a Dali signed lithogram but not numbered does anyone know if he did not number any works? TY

Mark Dawson January 25, 2013 at 11:15 AM

I recently purchased a lithograph of “Giraffe on fire” which was described as hand signed from “the human jungle” series. I was told it was No. 250 out of 500 but cannot see anything to confirm this? Is this piece likely to be a fake? Your opinion would be greatly appreciated.

Mark.

Andy February 4, 2013 at 6:05 PM

Hilarious! First folks pay for potentially fake artwork, then they have to pay to have someone tell them whether it’s fake or not. Even the “reference books” , that are supposed to help folks determine whether their artwork is fake, run for $250. Sounds like a scam on top of a scam.

glen dauman May 18, 2013 at 8:35 AM

If i send you a photo of my serigraph can you tell if it is original, it came from a art dealer in deer park ny, they are marked with an EA and signature
Thanks
Glen Dauman

Mary June 14, 2013 at 8:07 PM

Hi Erin,
I have a Dali dated 1965 it consists of vines, leaves and bullfighters. I can’t identify the piece. If I were to send you a photo complete with close up signature and printed name and date, could you identify it for me. I’m trying to determine a value.

Please send a courtesy return with email if you are interested in helping.
Thank you.

Mary June 14, 2013 at 8:17 PM

Erin,

I apologize it is dated 1967

Regards,
Marr

C. L. Skene June 21, 2013 at 8:49 AM

In mid-1980s, American Express offered 4 framed signed Dali prints featuring Don Quixote De La Mancha for $800.00 each. I bought all 4.
Titles of the prints are “Mirror of Chivalry”, “Aspiration”, Power of Thought Dream”, and I can’t find the title of the 4th.
How may I verify if these are fakes or legitimate?
Thank you.
cls

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: